Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Call of duty is boring and needs to change

This is a discussion on Call of duty is boring and needs to change within the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 forum, part of the C; Call of Duty is Boring and Needs to Change - Games Feature at IGN The Call of Duty 4: Modern ...

  1. #1
    INTJ
    Ps360's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,268
    Reputation
    310

    Call of duty is boring and needs to change

    Call of Duty is Boring and Needs to Change - Games Feature at IGN



    The Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare campaign was explosive, memorable, and remarkably fast-paced. Its online multiplayer achieved a refreshing newness typically reserved for Halo sequels. Modern Warfare transformed what we expected from first-person shooters, and in turn spawned one of the most successful entertainment properties in history.

    This year marks the fifth anniversary of Call of Duty 4, a game whose foundation has remained largely unchanged in its four annual follow-ups and spinoffs. With rumors of Black Ops 2 swelling, Call of Duty's assaulting frequency is becoming difficult to stomach. The brand is a symptom of mutual complacency. Players systematically trade cash for another fix that does little to improve upon the last experience. Activision has become the industry equivalent of a crank dealer, and we've become junkies too strung out to do anything about our problem.

    It's time for Call of Duty to change. Ignore that it will continue to make money hand over fist whether or not Activision actually decides to revitalize the slowing pulse. The series needs to step it up, expand its ambitions, and reinvigorate itself in exciting new ways, or it's going to run one of gaming's greatest into the ground. After all, this franchise changed the course of single- and multiplayer gaming. The only thing preventing Call of Duty from doing it again is itself, and this is what needs to change to make it happen.




    Without cheating, try to guess which game this is.


    Ditch set-pieces

    Plane crashes, quick-time fist-fights, in-your-face explosions. Those big "wow moments" are pivotal to the Call of Duty experience. They've become such a common identifier, however, that the predictable events become tiresome. We know by now we're going to fall off a building, ferociously murder a man up close, or take a bullet to the face at the end of a chapter. Some players live for these impressive moments, while others reject such limited involvement during gameplay. Call of Duty no longer needs to use scripted scenery as a crutch. It's time Infinity Ward and Treyarch let go of the "cinematic experience." Gamers aren't stupid, and it's time to stop treating them like they are. We know when we've narrowly avoided death and when the creator's made death narrowly miss us. The former is far more exciting because the latter is played out. We've seen a lot -- enough -- of this, and are ready to move onto something beyond being thrown on our ass every 15 minutes.

    Focus = coherency = caring

    Call of Duty's story is tough to follow because there are so many actors onstage at the same time. Why not focus on one character for a change? Seeing through one set of eyes would help us identify with the character in a stronger way than we would by switching rapidly between perspectives. Much as we dig Price and Soap, we don't know anything about them as people because there's no time to reflect on them as characters. Because we don't know who these men are, it's hardly upsetting when Mysterious Man With a Sweet Mustache lies within an inch of his life, or when Mr. Stupid Ski Mask eats a bullet. We can't care about the consequence of characters when there are no relatable values.

    Call of Duty needs to reel it in, focus on its cast as humans rather than cogs in the war machine, and tell a coherent, character-driven story we can dedicate our emotions to and keep track of. Then when the Big Bad inevitably shoves a gun in our mouth we know there's a genuine danger that our story is truly at an end. As it stands, Call of Duty characters -- good, evil, or, in the case of No Russian, innocent and unaware -- are disposable dramatic tricks that don't do anything to further the narrative.

    If the next Call of Duty were about the people then players would have something to hold on to. There would be a genuine reason to play through something more meaningful than the slaughter of evil foreigners aiming nukes at America. Or something.


    Stop trivializing violence

    Do we need to saw men's throats to understand the reality of violence? Eh, probably not.

    Call of Duty has exactly two moments where killing someone means something. Throwing a knife into a man's eye resonated with many players because there was more to killing him than the exhilarating, slow-motion reaction. You stopped a tyrannical psycho from doing worse to others than he did to you. The final kill in Call of Duty 4 has a similar effect -- Imran Zakhaev is a terrible person who has it coming, and in the name of those he's harmed you serve up karmic justice. The rest of this series is callous and uncaring.

    Slaughtering civilians in an airport, blowing up a little girl, and setting New York City under terrorist siege aren't the moving scenes their developers intended. This is emotionally exploitative junk that tries to disgust the audience into submission rather than make them consider consequences. The imagery is horrifying, but it doesn't carry actual value. This is meaningless shock without awe undermined by the assaulting, desensitizing violence of Call of Duty's campaign.

    Call of Duty conditions us only to care about violence inflicted against ourselves. The thrill in taking lives away by the second makes life meaningless, which implies the only violence that truly matters is that against the player. The consequence of player death is made light of as well, since failure is another opportunity to take away even more lives.

    These games need to find a new way to make us consider violence without pandering to players' deepest, darkest murder fantasies or compromising Call of Duty's value as entertainment. This isn't to say we should reflect on the ripple effect of every bullet fired -- this is supposed to be an interactive action movie, after all, not a Peter Molyneux pipe-dream -- but it's time we stopped behaving the same way as the assholes on the screen. We shouldn't be getting off on digging a knife into a throat, we should be uncomfortable having to do it. If we reflect on why we've killed thousands of evil terrorists in Call of Duty campaigns, the majority of us probably won't have a concrete reason beyond "they're the bad guys."

    Wouldn't it be more interesting to observe a game toying with our real-world psyche? Imagine Call of Duty making certain deaths mean something different depending on ifwe pull the trigger. What would the mental repercussions be on our character? What damage would we cause in not killing someone? If Spec-Ops: The Line and Rainbow Six: Patriots can't achieve this as intended, Call of Duty could be the first military FPS to make us think about the implications of the actions we're enjoying -- rather than continue to reinforce them with reward.


    Reinvent multiplayer

    The real reason a considerable percentage of the Call of Duty audience plays at all is for its fantastic and deep multiplayer. Remember your first Call of Duty 4 experience? It was incredible, and the enchantment hasn't ended for literally millions of people. So why change it?

    Each Call of Duty title's online adds or removes things here and there, but the difference from one game to the next is minuscule for the hardcore audience and undetectable to the casual player. If we're being blunt, the multiplayer experience is functionally identical today as it was before the last US Presidential election. New perk here, additional kill streak bonus there. Whatever. Numerous studios worked on Modern Warfare 3. Multiple companies. Let that sink in. Creative powerhouses composed of some of the industry's greatest talent put their heads together to make...the same thing. Now that everyone else has caught up, it's time for Call of Duty to do what it does best -- blow the lid off what we thought possible and reinvent the online landscape again. It's a tall order and an unfair demand, but hey, this is an ideal-world fantasy.

    With Call of Duty Elite in place to give us more maps on a regular basis, there's no need to release a Modern Warfare 4 or a Black Ops 2 with recognizable multiplayer. If incremental improvements and new maps are the problem year over year, Elite and game updates are the solution. So dedicate future efforts to breaking new ground. Remind us why we fell in love in the first place -- it'll make us forget why we fell out of love in the process.


    Get with the times

    It's been said, but it's worth stressing: 2007 was quite some time ago. In the age of the internet, five years may as well have happened alongside the Cold War. It was that long ago. Things have changed, but Call of Duty doesn't seem to have noticed. Games like Bulletstorm, Battlefield, and BioShock have experimented with interesting new ideas and expanded on existing concepts to give players a new (or, at the very least, new-ish) experience. Call of Duty engineered what's inspired everyone else, but now it's falling behind. The only way it can keep up with the evolving genre is to break free from itself.

    The simplest things, like vehicles in multiplayer or a co-op capable campaign would do wonders to modernize the series' warfare. The Spec-Ops multiplayer mode is where Infinity Ward's talent shined brightest in Modern Warfares 2 and 3, so why not pool those resources into cooking up similarly unique team-based missions on a grander scale?

    Go crazy. Realism isn't a factor now, these games are preposterous, so flex that a bit as well. Let us traverse maps in interesting new ways -- vehicles, climbing, sliding, whatever. Give us the ability to build advantageous assets -- Nazi Zombies is addictive because of its demanding resource management, not mindless brain-splattering. Make it a tactical, team-based affair where the classic Call of Duty play-style will turn your face into Swiss cheese. Add some terrain and structural destruction, exploration, airborne assaults, and give us single- and multiplayer goals that extend beyond blowing up everything. While we're at it, fix that damn spawning system. That we still spawn into fire, claymores, and grenades has to be developers trolling players, right? Unreal.



    Toggle Spoiler


  2. #2
    PRO Member
    Jace227's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    261
    Reputation
    10

    truth be told, Call of Duty has become Boring............. and i lost Interest in it long time ago...........
    if Black Ops 2 does happen i mite get it for Zombies (if they hopefully have it) but if not ill just be thinking about it til i decide so


  3. #3
    PRO Member
    Kerwan_Ratchet's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    In a multiverses of different bodies and souls
    Posts
    1,901
    Reputation
    74

    No shit Sherlock. Did it really take you a news article from IGN to realize that Camp or Die is boring, repititive and nearly the same game every single year?




  4. #4
    дурак
    Vulgar's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Longview, WA
    Posts
    1,389
    Reputation
    109

    It needs to change? I have a better idea, just kill off the series all together. Better yet, kill off all military FPS games.

    A guy can dream can't he?

    Though I will admit, I enjoyed World At War. But that's about it.
    Blank Friend Requests will be ignored and/or blocked
    My Checklist | My Trading Thread | My Youtube Channel
    "The oldest and strongest of emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown"

  5. #5
    Will Love you for Food
    apokolypz's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    815
    Reputation
    173

    Very good read and I can relate and agree with most of their statements.




  6. #6
    PRO Member
    Jace227's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    261
    Reputation
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Vulgar View Post
    It needs to change? I have a better idea, just kill off the series all together. Better yet, kill off all military FPS games.

    A guy can dream can't he?

    Though I will admit, I enjoyed World At War. But that's about it.
    Yeah i agree..... kill it off or Improve it if possible(even tho i doubt they can)(does get worse each year so far/multiplayer wise)


  7. #7
    Lvl 9 - Gold
    Hysteria's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Bedfordshire, UK
    Posts
    1,047
    Reputation
    18

    Quote Originally Posted by Jace227 View Post
    truth be told, Call of Duty has become Boring............. and i lost Interest in it long time ago...........
    if Black Ops 2 does happen i mite get it for Zombies (if they hopefully have it) but if not ill just be thinking about it til i decide so

    COD has become boring, but you would still buy it for one of the main reasons it's in a far worser state than just 'boring'?


  8. #8
    Buy my book, Alteration
    Digitalman123's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    In a very very... maaaaad wooorld
    Posts
    2,735
    Reputation
    80

    It's boring as all heck. The enemies are generic, the environments are repetitive, the gameplay never changes. PSM is calling AC Revelations the weakest of the series for not adding any new elements, and they give MW3 a 9 calling it fresh enough?


    Sig by DaRe
    Click the sig and be whisked away to my checklist (now with updates!)! Or click here to visit my YouTube channel!
    Author of Alteration, now available!

  9. #9
    дурак
    Vulgar's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Longview, WA
    Posts
    1,389
    Reputation
    109

    Quote Originally Posted by Jace227 View Post
    Yeah i agree..... kill it off or Improve it if possible(even tho i doubt they can)(does get worse each year so far/multiplayer wise)
    I was never a fan of the series to begin with. More like curious, but after WaW, I was disappointed.

    Looking at how well it sold, I don't expect a damn thing to change for the series until they start seeing sales drop. Which if my idiot radar is still correct than that will never happen.

    Someone on here once said they (IW/Treyarch) could sell a new Call Of Duty game (Just the disk), in a steamy sandwich bag full of dog shit, and these people will eat it up. Which looks to be fairly accurate.
    Blank Friend Requests will be ignored and/or blocked
    My Checklist | My Trading Thread | My Youtube Channel
    "The oldest and strongest of emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown"

  10. #10
    PRO Member
    Jace227's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    261
    Reputation
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Digitalman123 View Post
    It's boring as all heck. The enemies are generic, the environments are repetitive, the gameplay never changes. PSM is calling AC Revelations the weakest of the series for not adding any new elements, and they give MW3 a 9 calling it fresh enough?
    you lie??? are you serious??? Who called AC Revelation the weakest of the series???? that's BS!!! MW3 was not refreshing.... The story which was the only thing worth playing.. was Shorter than any other Cod and By far the Easiest OF all Cod i played...... (9)fresh my ass.. more like a 6 in my book


  11. #11
    Needz Trophy Card
    Pope Bodicus I's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    462
    Reputation
    86

    very good copy and paste of an article on a another site. read it earlier today, he makes excellent points.
    videogameman-If i was going to fuck my son, I'd kiss him first.
    Compalicious-in all fairness bodi, it is a bit on the big side
    bodigard-^^^that's what she said!

  12. #12
    The only sane person here
    KingLazy's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,222
    Reputation
    25

    Honestly Black Ops was my 2nd CoD and last CoD game and it pretty much got boring

  13. #13
    Lvl 7 - Gold
    iToxicityHD's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    661
    Reputation
    30

    The only reason why I get Call of Duty is because I need a Multiplayer game that is active, servers don't close, and people play after a couple years after release. Seems Call of Duty is the only one that can pull that off, sadly. Battlefield was fun, but I hated the communication issues they had.
    Currently Playing:|Mass Effect 2/Insanity Run|

    |Thanks Alison for the Signature.| My Youtube.

  14. #14
    PRO Member
    Jace227's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    261
    Reputation
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Vulgar View Post
    I was never a fan of the series to begin with. More like curious, but after WaW, I was disappointed.

    Looking at how well it sold, I don't expect a damn thing to change for the series until they start seeing sales drop. Which if my idiot radar is still correct than that will never happen.

    Someone on here once said they (IW/Treyarch) could sell a new Call Of Duty game (Just the disk), in a steamy sandwich bag full of dog shit, and these people will eat it up. Which looks to be fairly accurate.
    yeah, that statement seems to be fairly True......... Call of duty seems to be Drugs for Idiots ........... and at this rate we&(them/the makers) may never see the Sells Drop...


  15. #15
    One
    One is offline
    Lvl 6 - Silver
    One's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Toronto.
    Posts
    435
    Reputation
    46

    I completely agree, if the series is going to continue on with this I would rather see it die out than go on to be the worst franchise on the market.

    Nothing seems new anymore. The same engines, weapons, character models and killstreaks just continue to show up game after game, what happened to originality? I suggest Infinity Ward (Probably one of the lamest developers in the industry) look at a game like Team Fortress 2 to get some ideas on how they can revitalize the franchise. Of course, this isn't easy when a new game is popping up every year, where as Valve's TF2 is still staying strong after years since its release. My suggestion is to come up with something new, not something generic to this generation of gaming. Call of Duty 4 was so revolutionary because prior to that modern warfare was never done in the CoD franchise, it was simple, and to the point. Maps were great, everyone carried the same killstreak loadout, and most importantly it was pretty well balanced. Now we deal with terrible map design, horrible spawns and overpowered weapons that should have never even made the final product. It really upsets me because at one point in my life CoD was the holy grail of gaming to me, and now its sitting in the gutter with every other piece of shit out there.

    I still do play MW3, but that's only because I get a kick out of it when I'm with my friends. I admire the community because it's always busy, but about 50% of it is filled with trolls and assholes that need to learn some respect. I admire Treyarch for bringing something new to the franchise back in Black Ops, but Infinity Ward lost my respect after Modern Warfare 2.

    "Oh, so you think that the darkness is your ally? You merely adopted it, I was born in it."

  16. #16
    INTJ
    Ps360's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,268
    Reputation
    310

    Quote Originally Posted by One View Post
    I still do play MW3, but that's only because I get a kick out of it when I'm with my friends.
    all games are fun with friends, no matter how terrible/good they are

  17. #17
    illegal in 9 countries


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ōsutoraria
    Posts
    3,822
    Reputation
    594

    Acutely aware of the need to reinvigorate a dying franchise, Activision's board of directors discuss the next Call of Duty -


  18. #18
    PRO Member
    kc1598's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    502
    Reputation
    9

    They are right, they release the same stuff ever year, I bought COD 4, then I bought Black Ops, and that's it I haven't bought a COD game since then....

    Youtube.Com/Kc1597
    Signature By Djunglist (Sigs and Beyond)
    Avatar Edited By MAXTHUNDER

  19. #19
    PRO Member
    Anthnytdwg's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    151
    Reputation
    3

    Been tired of Cod, just get sucked into because friends still play it. Luckily, I got them hooked on Dead Island for awhile, so I don't have to play it as much.

  20. #20
    Regional Manager of War
    Admiral_Awesome91's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Empire City
    Posts
    1,677
    Reputation
    80

    I only buy the CoD titles that are made by Infinity Ward, they tend to be better.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10
Copyright © 2018 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO